Law Office of Michelle Ball Disabilities,Federal Laws,Special education/IEP Services Required After Manifestation Meeting If Student Moved 

Services Required After Manifestation Meeting If Student Moved 

Building with person sitting down

Last Updated on December 2, 2022 by Michelle Ball

By Michelle Ball, Sacramento California Expulsion, Special Education, sports/CIF, College, Education and School Attorney/Lawyer for Students since 1995

A student manifestation meeting, where conduct is evaluated in relation to a student’s disability before a special education student is forced to move, is critical. This meeting can stop a forced removal cold.

But what if the IEP (Individualized Education Program) team finds there is or isn’t a manifestation? How does that impact services which may be provided? Must the student receive a behavior evaluation and/or behavior supports? Maybe, but what is mandated depends on whether the student is being moved and what is in place already.

Hispanic teen sad
Manifestation meetings may occur when IEP students are facing an exclusion over 10 school days in a row or an exclusion pattern emerges

When Does a Manifestation IEP Meeting Usually Happen?

A manifestation IEP is a review meeting that typically occurs when a student is facing a school expulsion. They also happen when a student is forced out of school for more than ten days in a row or has a pattern of school exclusions over ten days, which result in a “change of placement” based on their closeness in time, their similarity, their length, the pattern of discipline, or other factors.

A “normal”‘ school move, that is sanctioned during a regular IEP team meeting, and agreed to by the student’s parents, is not one requiring a manifestation determination. However, a move forced on a special education student based on their conduct may warrant one, depending on how long it is, or the pattern of exclusions that school year.

Two Main Questions at Manifestation IEP Meetings

Typically, manifestation IEP teams limit their inquiry to whether the student’s conduct in question was caused by or is directly or substantially related to the student’s disabilities or is a direct result of a failure to implement the student’s IEP. If so, the conduct is said to be a manifestation of the student’s disability.

There are other questions the IEP manifestation team should answer as well, but sometimes they forget.

Therapy session with student, graphic
Additional behavior assessment and supports may be required if a manifestation exists

These additional questions surround whether an assessment is needed, whether support plans should be added or altered, and what behavior or other supports should be provided to help the student. Whether these items are required or not may depend on whether the student will be removed from their current school, or are able to remain.

Services When Manifestation Found

If a manifestation is found for an IEP student and the student was facing an expulsion, the expulsion process ends.

That student is then also entitled to:

  1. A Functional Behavioral Assessment (aka FBA), if one was not done already
  2. Implementation of a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) or
  3. Review of the BIP if one exists, and
  4. Modification of the BIP to address the behavior and
  5. Return of the student to their placement (unless out on a 45 day exclusion for weapons, drugs or serious bodily injury, or unless the parent agrees otherwise)

These items are mandated but still may be overlooked by manifestation IEP teams.

When No Manifestation, But Student Facing Move, Services Still Mandated

Girl in dress with poppies
Additional assessment and services may still be mandated even if no manifestation is found

When no manifestation is found, and a student is being removed from their placement (because they are being excluded pre-expulsion, after expulsion, due to an involuntary transfer or otherwise), the student is still entitled to certain services and assessments.

School staff definitely can overlook their service and placement mandates under federal law for students for whom no manifestation is established. It seems schools think their job is done once conduct is not found to be a manifestation. As a result, schools may do nothing and think they can just kick the student home to await their expulsion hearing. They are wrong.

Federal law requires that students receive the following, even if no manifestation is found, and the student is facing a change of placement:

  1. Their educational services, even if in a new environment, which enable them to participate in the general education curriculum and progress toward their IEP goals (starting the eleventh cumulative day of exclusion that school year).
  2. A Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) and
  3. Behavioral intervention services and modifications, which are designed to address the behavior violation to prevent its reoccurrence.

This applies if an IEP student is being moved based on their conduct, and even if manifestation is not found

When No Manifestation Found, But Student Remains in Their Placement

If no manifestation finding is made by the IEP team, but the student returns to their same placement, there is no mention of similar behavioral supports or evaluations. However, parents can still request a behavioral assessment and additional supports to help the student.

Districts Are Prone To Deny Manifestation

Young black male student looking sad
Districts don’t want to find manifestation as it may stop a student move

In my experience, IEP teams usually will deny a student’s conduct is directly related to their disabling conditions, as then discipline or involuntary transfers can proceed. Sometimes this is an accurate statement, and sometimes it is not.

It is important that parents advocate for a finding of manifestation, if possible, to ensure the student is returned to their placement and that services proceed rather than punishment.

But, even if no manifestation is found, a student moved may still receive assessments and supports, and should be in a placement where they can access a general education environment and make progress toward their IEP goals.

Attorney Michelle Ball has assisted special education parents since the mid-1990s with IEPs, manifestation meetings, 504s and many student issues. As a lawyer for students in downtown Sacramento, she reaches across California, to all areas, including Fremont, Hanford, San Diego, Tahoe, Folsom and many other locations.